Details

According to council documents, the proposed project would sit on more than 116 acres of land just south of 133rd Street and west of State Line Road.

Here are the details of the Cameron’s Court:

• 1,421,670 square feet of residential space for 935 dwelling units, including:
  • 766 luxury apartment units,
  • 29 single family residential units,
  • 9 duplex buildings totaling 18 units,
  • and 100 unit assisted living facility.
• 127,365 square feet of retail space, including:
  • 50,000-square-foot grocery store
  • 127,365 square feet of retail 4,500 Sq. Ft. (100 seat) drive-thru restaurant at the southwest intersection of 133rd Street and State Line Road
• 285,245 square feet of office space
• 17.4 acres of green space, including the addition of Chadwick Park
• Inclusion of bike and walking paths

Concerns

Nearly 30 residents who live near the proposed Cameron’s Court site addressed the council Monday, expressing their concerns for the project.

Many residents repeated similar concerns, including:

• increased traffic along 133rd Street creating congestion,
• property values potentially being harmed,
• higher density in the area as 935 living units could add thousands of residents to the community,
• a lack of green space and a lack of communal areas for non-residents of the complex to use,
• potential impacts on the schools in the surrounding area, including increased enrollment.

“The project is not mixed use,” Mark Casey, a resident who says he has attended all the meetings involving Cameron’s Court, said. “If you do the math on just the left side this project, it is 99% residential.”

Casey said not only was he concerned about things such as density and traffic, but also the process for developing the project’s plan.

He argued the developer should have been more involved in hearing feedback from neighboring areas about what they would like to see Cameron’s Court become.

Developer’s response

Rick Oddo, president of Oddo Development and the developer for Cameron’s Court, argued a traffic study conducted prior to this meeting found 133rd Street can handle the influx of cars.

“One-hundred and thirty third [Street] was designed to handle 15,000 or up to 18,000 capacity. It’s currently only using 7,000,” Oddo said. “We’re going to add approximately 2,500 cars a day. The additional cars will get us at 9,500 cars per day at 63% of design capacity.”

Oddo also said Johnson County appraisers have stated that there will likely be no impact on the value of the neighboring homes.

He cited other large mixed-use developments in the Leawood area, such as Park Place and Mission Farms, stating the home around those areas have not seen a change in value after the projects were completed.

In terms of green space, Oddo said in addition to removing a building in order to add more greenery, the addition of a small park in the middle of the complex — currently being called Chadwick Park — will add more green space than their plan originally called for.

Oddo pointed out that 34% of the complex was now slated to be green space.

In regards to impacting schools, Oddo said, he reached out to Blue Valley School District officials, who informed him that Cameron’s Court was projected to have little impact to three schools nearby, which the district said are running at 75-80% capacity.

Council’s response

The application for Cameron’s Court was initially heard by the Leawood Planning Commission in August 2020.

Since then, developers have gone to nine different meetings with the city to try to settle on a plan both the city and developers can be satisfied with.

On Mondayt, the council split on what was presented, with some councilmembers saying they were eager to pass the plan as it was laid out.

“If we don’t pass this, two questions: What’s going to go in its place? And how long is it going to be?” councilmember James Azeltine said.

Alzeltine argued the complex meets the city’s low-density requirements and fit the conclusions of a recent study of the 135th Street corridor.

Other councilmembers, however, were less than enthusiastic to pass the application, repeating many of the same fears residents had voiced during the evening.

“I agree this plan has come a long way,” Mayor Peggy Dunn said. “But if there were more opportunities for some more home ownership and not as many apartments, I think it would be a better plan.”

In the end, the council decided to vote on continuance, and the project will be addressed again at Leawood’s City Council on Dec. 6.

Until then, several of the councilmembers said they would like to see developers get the neighbors more involved in the project’s planning.